RELATIONSHIP COACHING

RELATIONSHIP COACHING

  • Home
  • Blog
  • Books
  • Programs
  • Hypnotherapy
  • Strategy Call
  • What is NLP?
  • Assessments
  • Chat
  • Relationship FAQ
  • Contact


What Does It Mean to Love Someone?
Love Is Not One Thing — It Is the Whole of You, Offered to Another

We use the word love the way we use the word fine. It covers everything from mild affection to the kind of feeling that rewires your entire life. We say we love pizza, we love a good movie, we love our children. The same word. Radically different things.

But ask someone to define love… the real kind, the kind that keeps you awake at three in the morning, the kind you would rearrange your whole world for, and most people pause. They reach for metaphors. They describe what it feels like rather than what it is. Because love, despite being one of the most written-about and most researched experiences in human history, remains one of the hardest to put precisely into words.

This piece is an attempt at precision. Not a reduction — love resists reduction — but an honest examination of what the research says, what the experience reveals, and what it actually means, at the most fundamental level, to genuinely love another person.

Love Is Not a Feeling. It Is a Decision Made Repeatedly.

The popular understanding of love is that it is something that happens to you. You fall in love. You feel it or you do not. It arrives, it grows, it fades, it ends. In this framing, love is something the world does to you… a state you are in rather than a choice you make.

The research suggests something more complex and more demanding.

Psychologist Robert Sternberg’s Triangular Theory of Love, developed at Yale in the 1980s and widely replicated since, proposes that love in its fullest form consists of three components: intimacy (the felt closeness, the sharing of inner life, the sense of being genuinely known), passion (the romantic and physical intensity, the pull toward the other person), and commitment (the decision to remain, to maintain the relationship through difficulty, to choose the person again and again beyond the initial feeling).

What Sternberg’s research consistently shows is that passion, the component most people associate with love, is also the most volatile. It peaks early and fades with familiarity. Intimacy builds slowly and requires sustained honesty and vulnerability to develop. Commitment, the least romantic-sounding of the three, is the component that makes love last and it is, by definition, a repeated choice.

Sternberg, R.J. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93(2), 119–135.

The feeling of love may arrive without your permission. The act of loving genuinely, sustainably, across time and difficulty requires everything you have.

What It Actually Costs

To love someone is to become vulnerable in a way that cannot be undone. You have let them matter. And the moment another person genuinely matters to you, you have handed them the specific capacity to cause you a kind of pain that nothing else can produce.

This is not a side effect of love. It is its nature.

Brené Brown, whose research on vulnerability and connection at the University of Houston spans decades and thousands of interviews, found that genuine love and the willingness to be hurt are not separable. Her data consistently showed that people who experienced the deepest connection, who described their relationships as genuinely meaningful and sustaining, were also the people most willing to risk emotional exposure. The armored version, the love held at a careful distance, and the relationship maintained with enough guardedness to avoid real hurt, her research found that it also avoided real depth.

To love someone is to allow the full weight of their well-being to land on you. Their pain becomes something you feel. Their absence is something you carry. Their growth is something that matters to you independently of what it means for you. This is not a poetic exaggeration. It is a neurological reality. Brain imaging research shows that social pain, including the grief of losing someone we love, activates the same neural regions as physical pain. Love is not metaphorically felt in the body. It is literally felt there.

Brown, B. (2010). The Gifts of Imperfection. Hazelden Publishing.

Eisenberger, N.I., Lieberman, M.D., & Williams, K.D. (2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302(5643), 290–292.

The Love You Have for Your Children

There is a specific quality to parental love that most parents struggle to describe before they experience it and that most non-parents find difficult to fully understand. It is not simply intense affection. It is a fundamental reorganization of priority.

The neuroscience is illuminating. Research using brain imaging to study mothers viewing photographs of their infants found activation in the brain’s reward circuitry, including the dopamine-rich regions associated with addiction — suggesting that the pull of a parent toward their child is not merely social or sentimental but is encoded at the level of the brain’s deepest motivational architecture. A parent’s love for their child is, in part, a biological imperative dressed in the language of emotion.

But it is also something more. Parental love is fundamentally unconditional in a way that no other love quite manages to be. You do not love your child because of who they are. You love them before you know who they are. You love the possibility of them. And that love, which exists independently of their behavior, their choices, their success or failure, their ability to return it in kind, is one of the purest forms the emotion takes.

It is also, notably, one of the most anguishing. To love a child is to love someone you must eventually release. Every act of parenting, properly understood, is preparation for a goodbye… not the goodbye of death or loss, but the goodbye of a full life successfully launched. The parents who love most deeply are also the ones who grieve most genuinely when the child no longer needs them the way they once did.

Strathearn, L., et al. (2009). What’s in a smile? Maternal brain responses to infant facial cues. Pediatrics, 122(1), 40–51.

The Love You Have for Your Friends

The ancient Greeks had a word for it: philia. The love between equals. The love built not on biological necessity or romantic passion but on genuine mutual recognition. The experience of meeting another person and finding, unexpectedly, that they understand something fundamental about you.

Friendship love is often underestimated in our cultural hierarchy of relationships, where romantic partnership is placed above all else. But research consistently shows that the quality of someone’s friendships is one of the strongest predictors of psychological well-being, more strongly associated with happiness and longevity than income, status, or even physical health.

The Harvard Study of Adult Development, one of the longest-running studies of human life ever conducted, tracked participants across eighty years and found that the single most consistent predictor of health and happiness in later life was the quality of close relationships, and friendship was a central component. The researchers concluded, in language that cut through decades of data: good relationships keep us healthier and happier.

To love a friend is to choose someone. Not from obligation or biology, not from the pull of passion, but from the free decision that this person makes life better. That they know you — perhaps even the version of you that you show no one else, and that being known by them is a gift. Friend love is chosen love, renewed daily by the simple decision to remain present in another person’s life.

Waldinger, R. (2015). What makes a good life? Lessons from the longest study on happiness. TED Talk, TEDxBeaconStreet.

The Love You Have for Family

Family love is its own category. Tne that combines elements of all the others while remaining irreducibly itself. It carries the biological weight of parental love without always carrying its tenderness. It contains the chosen quality of friendship without the freedom to easily walk away. It is, more than any other love, the one we did not choose and the one that most profoundly shapes how we love everything else.

Research in attachment theory, pioneered by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, established that the quality of early family bonds, particularly the relationship with primary caregivers, creates the internal working models through which we understand what love is, what it requires, and what we deserve from it. In a very real sense, family is where we learn love. Its lessons, absorbed in childhood before we had the language to examine them, operate in the background of every relationship we form as adults.

Family love can be among the most sustaining and among the most damaging of human experiences. The same relationship that provides the foundational sense of being loved and belonging can, if it is characterized by conditional love, rejection, or harm, produce the wounds that take decades to understand and address. Family love matters so much because it arrives first. It is the template.

Bowlby, J. (1969). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1: Attachment. Basic Books.

The Love You Have for a Partner

Romantic love, the love between partners, is the form the culture most obsesses over and most frequently misrepresents. Popular narratives would have us believe it is primarily a feeling, that its intensity is the measure of its authenticity, and that when the intensity fades the love has ended. The research says something different and, in the long run, far more hopeful.

Elaine and Arthur Aron’s self-expansion model of romantic love proposes that a significant romantic relationship expands who you are and that in loving someone, you incorporate their perspectives, their resources, their ways of seeing the world into your own sense of self. The neuroscience of romantic love, studied extensively by Helen Fisher at Rutgers University, shows that long-term partnerships shift in their neurochemical profile: from the dopamine-dominated urgency of early passion toward the oxytocin-rich warmth of deep attachment. It does not become less. It becomes different.

Romantic love, at its fullest, is the decision to build a shared life with another person and to make their reality your concern, to grow alongside rather than simply next to them, to repair when it breaks and to choose again when the choosing is hard. It is the love most shaped by communication, most tested by time, and most deeply dependent on the willingness of both people to keep doing the work.

It is also the love most capable of transformation. A partnership that chooses honesty over comfort, genuine repair over the pretense of peace, curiosity about the other person over the assumption of knowing — this is a love that deepens rather than fades. That becomes, across years, something richer and more specific than anything the early passion could have promised.

Fisher, H. (2004). Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. Henry Holt.

Aron, A., & Aron, E.N. (1986). Love and the Expansion of Self: Understanding Attraction and Satisfaction. Hemisphere.

So What Does It Mean?

To love someone, in any of these form, is to let them matter. Fully, at real cost, without the guarantee of how it will be returned.

It is the willingness to be changed by another person’s existence. To carry their grief when they cannot carry it alone. To find their flourishing genuinely important, independent of what it does for you. To show up… not just in the grand moments but in the ordinary ones, in the moments when nothing is asked of you except presence.

It means choosing them… not once, but repeatedly. Not because the feeling demands it but because you have decided they are worth the choosing.

Research can illuminate the mechanisms of love: the neurotransmitters, the attachment patterns, the communication behaviors that make it last. But what the research keeps circling back to is what Gottman’s decades of studying couples, what the Harvard longevity study, what Brené Brown’s interviews all point toward, is something that the numbers can document but cannot fully contain.

Love is the primary thing. The thing beneath the ambition and the achievement and the distraction. The thing that, at the end of a life examined honestly, most people identify as the point of it. Not the love you were given without asking for it. The love you chose to give and to build and to maintain, across all the difficulty that genuine love requires.

Love is not the feeling that arrives. It is the life you build around the fact of another person’s existence mattering to yours.

    LOCATION

    Savannah, Georgia, U.S.

    • TikTok
    • Facebook
    • LinkedIn

    PAGES

    • Home
    • Blog
    • Books
    • Programs
    • Hypnotherapy
    • Strategy Call
    • What is NLP?
    • Assessments
    • Chat
    • Relationship FAQ
    • Contact